
REF: 8EPR-ER
PROGRESS
POLLUTION REPORT
LIBBY ASBESTOS
Libby, Lincoln
County, Montana
I. HEADING
Date:
May 22, 2001
Site Name: Libby Asbestos (Export & Screening Plants)
From: Paul Peronard, OSC
Duc Nguyen, OSC
To: Patty Smith, EPA Headquarters
POLREP
No.: #3
II. BACKGROUND
Site No.: BC
Response Authority: CERCLA
CERCLIS No: MT0009083840
NPL Status: NA
Action Memorandum Status: Approved 5/23/00
Start Date : 6/01/00
Demobilization Date: TBD
Completion Date: TBD
III. SITE INFORMATION
A. Incident Category
Time Critical, Fund-Lead and PRP-Lead
B. Site Description (Please see the
initial POLREP)
1. Site
Location
The Site is located in Montana within Sections 3 and 10, T.30N.,R.31W. of the Libby Quadrangle in the County of Lincoln.
2. Description of Threat (Please see the
initial POLREP)
C. Preliminary Assessment/Site
Inspection Results
The Removal Action authorized by
the Action Memorandum dated May 23, 2000 was approved to address the threats
posed by high levels of amphibole asbestos at the Screening Plant including the
Kootenai Development Company (KDC) Properties (EPA-lead) and The Export Plant
(PRP-lead). During the course of the
removal, W.R. Grace denied access to the mine for repository and to the KDC
properties for the cleanup, which resulted in 90,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil being currently stockpiled at the Screening Plant and KDC
properties and which still need to be cleaned up. Additionally, subsequent sampling has identified high levels of
amphibole asbestos in homes, Libby schools, and other affected areas that
require time-critical removal actions:
Schools:
On February 8, 2001, the Superintendent of Libby Schools requested EPA’s
help in testing and possibly removing the high school and middle school running
tracks. Preliminary results from the
investigation conducted in March 2001 show: 3-5% by PLM of amphibole asbestos
concentration in the subsurface vermiculite ore tailings of the running tracks
(Libby High School and Libby Middle School), 2% by PLM in the ice skating rink
at the Plummer Elementary School. EPA
also learned that this materials may have been used in other areas in Libby. Therefore, the scope of the investigation
has been expanded to include other elementary schools, middle schools, city
parks, golf courses, and daycare centers in the Libby area.
Residential
Areas: Several residences have been found either with
unexpanded vermiculite in piles or mixed in the sodded areas outside their
homes (2-5% asbestos by PLM). One
residence of approximately 5-acres consists of a home, two 80-foot long
buildings storing asbestos-contaminated equipment that once was used at the
mine and processing areas, and one 40-foot long metal shop constructed with
sluice pipes that also were used at the mine.
The
Rainey Creek Road: This road was
used to transport the vermiculite ore from the Zonolite mine to the processing
facilities. It was built with material
from gravel pits; but sand materials (Pyroxene) containing asbestos, that were
used to sand the road in the winter, were imported from the vermiculite mine. The road is contaminated with significant
asbestos levels ranging from non-detect to greater than 5% by PLM and generates
significant airborne concentrations of asbestos, even with normal traffic
activities, if no dust suppression is implemented. The 6-mile road is being used for recreation and a hauling route
for logging company. It is owned by
several entities: Lincoln County owns
from its intersection with Highway 37 to the lower pond; W.R. Grace owns from
the lower pond to Jackson Creek; and the US Forest Service owns after Jackson
Creek.
IV. RESPONSE
INFORMATION
A. Situation
1. Current situation/removal actions to
date:
The Export Plant: (See previous POLREPs for background information)
All amphibole
asbestos contaminated soil has been removed.
Five buildings on-site were initially decontaminated, but were
subsequently re-sampled by EPA in February of 2001, showing that high levels of
contamination still remain in the encapsulated areas (i.e. window base, wood
joints, etc.). Originally, W.R. Grace
chose decontamination of those buildings rather than demolition. A dispute relating to the restoration phase
of the decontaminated buildings is still unresolved. The contention is that when W.R. Grace decontaminated the
buildings by removing the interior walls and wooden floors in conjunction with
building previous deterioration, it made those buildings structurally unsound -
resulting in a very high cost for restoration. W.R. Grace has agreed to
demolish 4 out of 5 buildings and is negotiating with the City of Libby (owner
of the Export Plant) to restore the remaining Planner building. Soil restoration to its original grade was
completed in April 2001.
The Screening
Plant: Because significantly
elevated amphibole asbestos concentrations have been found along the Kootenai
River’s bank of the Raintree Nursery, EPA has decided to excavate the entire
asbestos-contaminated bank where the various sizes of vermiculite ore
containing amphibole asbestos were conveyed across the river into the train
cars in the past. Contaminated soil in
the long shed will be removed by June 29.
The longshed and its components also will be dismantled and hauled to
the mine. The hauling of 90,000 cubic
yards of asbestos contaminated soil and debris to the mine was beginning on May
18, 2001. The draft restoration plan for the site has been revised and will be
resubmitted to the Parkers (owners) for a final review in June of 2001.
The Rainy Creek
Road: On May 1, 2001, in
conjunction with USFS and the Lincoln County, the entire road was temporary
closed to the public from Highway 37 to the edge of the W.R. Grace’s property
and watered for dust suppression. On
May 11, 2001, the first half-mile of the road from Highway 37 was paved with
asphalt to prevent the surface asbestos-contaminated soil from becoming
airborne. A Decontamination Station
also was installed at the half-mile mark to decontaminate the soil hauling
trucks as they come down from the mine.
Schools:
Since high levels of asbestos
contamination were found at the Libby High School, Libby Middle School, and
Plummer Elementary School, the investigation scope has been expanded to other
schools (Asa Wood and McGrade Elementary Schools), City parks (Fireman’s Park
and Lincoln Playground), and St. John Day Care Center in Libby. New findings will be provided when the
analytical results are completed. At the Community Advisor Group meeting on
April 26, EPA told the Libby community that the cleanup of these schools is now
a top priority and made a commitment to begin removal activities after school
is out for the summer. A brief summary
of schools that have been sampled, follows:
Plummer
Elementary School: Asbestos
concentrations were found in the surface soil
5% and in the subsurface 1%. Asbestos was
also found on and below the surface of the ice skating rink. Because the school year is still in
progress, the ice skating rink has been temporary covered with a tarp & 4
inches of sand and fenced off to prevent any potential exposure.
Libby
High School: Asbestos
was initially found in the subsurface at a depth of 2-6 inches with asbestos
concentration ranging from 3-8% by weight underneath the capped running
track. The interior inspections and
review of all previous AHERA (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act)
inspection documents showed no asbestos inside of school buildings. The track has been closed and is scheduled
to be removed this summer and restored bvy August 25, 2001.
Libby
Middle School: Like the high school, asbestos
contamination has been found at the school’s running track. At the asphalt capped track, asbestos
concentration found in soil under the track showed between 0-2% at a depth of
0-2 inches and 2-8% at a depth of 2-24 inches.
Other school locations (e.g. football field) show no asbestos. The interior inspections and reviews of all
previous AHERA inspection documents showed no asbestos inside of school
buildings. The track has been closed
and is scheduled to be removed this summer and restored by August 15,
2001.
Asa
Wood Elementary and Lincoln Playground:
No asbestos was found.
Fireman’s
Park: Only one subsurface soil
sample showed a trace of asbestos. More
surface and subsurface soil samples are scheduled to be collected.
EPA will publish
a fact sheet and follow-up with public meeting(s) for the parents and students
to convey sample results and to discuss removal actions associated with the
affected schools..
Medical
Testing Program: (See the
initial POLREPs for background information).
- Last
year, ATSDR analyzed mortality statistics associated with historical asbestos
exposure in Libby, Montana, during the 20-year period from 1979 to 1998. Also, ATSDR conducted free screening for
eligible people potentially affected by asbestos-contaminated vermiculite in
Libby. Altogether, 6,144 people were
screened. On February 22, 2001, ATSDR
presented the preliminary findings of the Interim Report from 1,078
participants (18%) of 6,144 participants.
The findings are:
Results
of medical screening to date indicate that 19 to 37% of tested participants had
scarring in their chest wall. 73% of
these were not associated with W.R. Grace mining or processing activities.
Mortality
resulting from asbestos exposure was approximately 4,000 to 6,000% greater in
Libby than an average community.
- ATSDR will begin the second round
of medical testing for approximately 2,000 people in August, 2001.
On-Going
Projects:
Phase
II - Residential Sampling: To date, most air samples at homes have
been collected using a stationary air monitor located in the living areas. However, there are a couple of issues which
exist with regard to both the collection technique (stationary air monitor) and
the analytical technique (Transmission Electron Microscopy - TEM):
First, a
stationary monitor located in such a home is useful and appropriate for
assessing the “passive” exposures of people in the home who are not engaged in
the routine and special activities which generate dust (e.g. dusting,
sweeping). Therefore, the first
objective of this sampling effort is to measure asbestos levels in the
breathing zone of individuals engaged in those activities and to compare those
measurements to data collected from the co-located stationary air monitor.
Second, with
regard to the analytical technique, the issue is that air samples have been
historically analyzed for asbestos using the Phase Contrast Light Microscopy
(PCM) method, and the current slope factor calculation for EPA’s Risk
Assessment is expressed in units of risk per PCM fiber per cubic centimeter of
air (f/cc). It is also widely recognized
that the TEM analysis is more accurate and powerful than PCM analysis. Therefore, the second objective is to
analyze a series of different air samples using both TEM and PCM methods in
order to derive a site-specific correlation between the two.
Finally, the
third objective of this study is to utilize the data collected to derive
preliminary assessments of the potential health risk to people who engage in
these types of activities.
EPA has begun
Phase II on March 5, 2001. Four
scenarios selected for evaluation in this study and investigation are:
Scenario
I: Routine household activities
(excluding active cleaning) - 14 households have participated.
Scenario
II: Active house cleaning activities (dusting, sweeping, etc.) - 11 homes have
participated to date;
Scenario
III: Simulated remodeling activities that involve direct contact or handling of
vermiculite insulation - 4 homes are scheduled for scenario III. First home was completed on May 3, 2001.
Scenario
IV: Rototilling a home garden containing vermiculite in the soil - 1 home
(Summer 2001).
Preliminary
results in Scenario I & II’s of some homes showed asbestos levels in
breathing zones as high as 0.04 f/cc.
As expected, the preliminary results are conflicting because the light
microscope cannot tell the difference between an asbestos fiber and other
elongated particles in the sample; whereas the electron microscope positively
identifies asbestos. A better picture
of Libby residential exposure will be available when the Phase 2 program and
its sample analyses are completed and we have a chance to look at all of the
data (approx. 6 weeks).”
2. Enforcement
On
July 18, 2000, W.R. Grace reacquired the mine and the KDC properties and
immediately refused EPA access to the mine for repository and the KDC
properties for cleanup. On September
14, 2000, EPA in conjunction with DOJ filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court
in Missoula, Montana, against W.R. Grace - seeking to access the KDC properties
and the mine for removal activities. As
a result of the hearing (December 20, 2000) and follow-up mediation (January 25
& 29, 2000) to resolve the dispute over the access, the motion was sent
back to the Missoula judge for final ruling.
On March 9, 2000, the U.S. District Court in Missoula ruled in favor of
the EPA to use the mine for repository and KDC properties for removal activities. On April 2, 2001, W.R. Grace & Company
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection because of a rising number of
asbestos-related lawsuits nationwide.
On
March 30, 2001, EPA filed its complaint in Montana federal district court in
Missoula to recover $10 million that EPA has spent investigating and cleanup
asbestos contamination from a vermiculite mine near Libby. The lawsuit also asked the court for
declaratory judgement for any future costs expended by EPA in further
investigation and cleanup at the Site.
B. Planned Removal Actions
EPA has proposed
more funding to initiate removal actions which will mitigate the threat to the
public health and welfare or the environment posed by the asbestos present on
the KDC Properties, the Rainy Creek Road, the school tracks, the ice skating
rink, and two residential properties which have no Zonolite insulation in the
attic and/or walls. In general, removal activities will consist of excavation,
demolition, off-site disposal (mine), and restoration.
More unexpanded vermiculite has been found in several residential areas (i.e. chicken pens, sodded areas, etc.). The soil was probably imported from the mine and used as a fill material. A pilot removal action for the Seikie property was based on high levels of amphibole asbestos found indoors and outdoors. The contamination is believed to come from asbestos fibers carried or tracked indoors from fibrous airborne dust or on shoes/clothes that came in contact with asbestos contaminated vermiculite piles, soil, or equipment placed outdoors - not from the Zonolite insulation in the attic or walls of the home. For the Brownlee property, an asbestos-contaminated pile, which was imported from the mine, will be removed.
In
order of priority, the proposed removal actions are outlined below:
|
Action Items |
Planned Start
Date |
Planned
Completion |
|
1.
Screening Plant - Hauling 90,000 cubic yards - Dismantling Long Shed - Final Restoration |
April 4, 2001 May 18, 2001 June 18, 2001 October 24,
2001 |
November 11,
2001 July 31, 2001 July 6, 2001 November 9,
2001 |
|
2. Export Plant |
April 2, 2001 |
July 28, 2001 |
|
3. KDC
Properties: - The Flyways - The Bluff |
May 23, 2001 May 23, 2001 |
July 25, 2001 July 25,
2001 |
|
4. Schools - Elementary School - High School Track - Middle School Track |
June 6, 2001 July 6, 2001 July 30,
2001 |
July 17, 2001 August 21, 2001 September
13, 2001 |
|
5. Residential
Areas - The Brownlee - The Seifkie |
June 15, 2001 May 28, 2001 |
July 15, 2001 October 30,
2001 |
|
6.
The Rainy Creek |
May 1, 2001 |
December 15, 2001 |
C. Next Steps
Working with the
Burlington Northern Railroad to address high levels of asbestos airborne on the
railroad tracks and loading/unloading areas where that used to transport
vermiculite products in between the Export Plant and the Screening Plant.
Working with the
Montana Governor, Montana DEQ, and Libby community to initiate the process for
listing the Libby Asbestos Site on the National Superfund Priorities List
(NPL). The listing could occur either
one site including all of the Libby or as two sites with the mine and City
listed separately.
Compiling
analytical results from the on-going Phase II - Residential Sampling and
environmental investigations to determine the need for asbestos-contaminated
mitigation actions.
D. Key Issues
The residential
removal as amended in this amendment does not set a precedent or constitute a
nationally significant issue relating to vermiculite insulation. However, a majority of homes in Libby have
Zonolite insulation containing high levels of amphibole fibers; and EPA is
concerned that failure to remove Zonolite insulation in the attic and/or walls
from contaminated homes may result not only in post-cleanup re-contamination
indoors, but may also result in releases to the environment. Contamination from Libby vermiculite may be
widespread. The Libby vermiculite was
shipped to more than 200 facilities nationwide, and the insulation produced
from Libby ore was placed in 900,000 to 15,000,000 homes in the U.S. Currently, there is no national policy for
addressing homes having asbestos-contaminated vermiculite insulation.
V. COST
INFORMATION
|
EXTRAMURAL COSTS |
Planned Cost (Action Memo - 5/23/00) |
Cost to Date (01/31/01) |
Proposed Ceiling (FY01) |
|
1. Export Plant (PRP - Lead) - DOT-Volpe Oversight and Engineering - Site Mobilization - Site Excavation - Demolition the Long Shed and Tunnels - Restoration - Settlement (Parker) - Transportation and Disposal of Waste/Debris (Zonolite Mine) - Analytical Support Subtotal |
$100,000 $110,000 $330,000
-0- $300,000
-0- $220,000 $275,000 $1,325,000 |
$216,000 $236,000 $452,000 |
$200,000 $200,000 |
|
2. Screening Plant (Fund - Lead) - DOT-Volpe Oversight and Engineering - Site Mobilization - Site Excavation - River Banks - Demolition the Long Shed and Tunnels - Restoration - Settlement (Parker) - Transportation and Disposal of Waste/Debris (Zonolite Mine) - Analytical Support - Outstanding Costs from FY00 Subtotal |
$250,000 $180,000 $525,000 $525,000 $1,100,000 -0- $250,000 $275,000 $3,105,000 |
$252,000 $180,000 $2,779,000 -0- $1,196,000 -0- -0- $1,488,000 $5,895,000 |
$250,000 $100,000 $400,000 $200,000 $683,000 $1,500,000 $650,000 $300,000 $1,917,000 $6,000,000 |
|
3. KDC Properties (Screening Plant) - DOT-Volpe Oversight and Engineering - Site Mobilization - Excavation & Restoration - Transportation and Disposal of Waste (Zonolite Mine) Subtotal |
-0- -0- -0- -0- -0- |
-0- -0- -0- -0- -0- |
$400,000 $50,000 $1,300,000 $350,000 $1,500,000 |
|
4. School Tracks and other Affected Areas - Preparation of Site Property - Excavation of Contaminated Soil and Structures and Restoration - Transportation and Disposal of Waste (Zonolite Mine) Subtotal |
-0- -0- -0- -0- |
-0- -0- -0- -0- |
$200,000 $2,500,000 $300,000 $2,500,000 |
|
5. Residential
Areas - Residences (Brownlee) - Residence (Seifkie) - Other Residences Subtotal |
-0- -0- -0- -0- |
-0- -0- -0- -0- |
$100,000 $400,000 $100,000 $600,000 |
|
6. Rainy Road - Interim Action (Temporary Paving) - Excavation - Transportation and Disposal of Waste (Zonolite Mine) - Restoration Subtotal |
-0- -0- -0- -0- -0- |
-0- -0- -0- -0- -0- |
$250,000 $300,000 $200,000 $750,000 $1,500,000 |
|
Subtotal
Extramural |
$4,630,000 |
$6,347,000 |
$12,300,000 |
|
Contingency
(20%) |
$886,000 |
$1,269,000 |
$2,460,000 |
|
Total
Extramural Costs |
$5,516,000 |
$7,616,000 |
$14,760,000 |
|
INTRAMURAL COSTS |
|
|
|
|
1. EPA Direct Costs |
$150,000 |
$250,000 |
$250,000 |
|
2. EPA Indirect Costs |
$150,000 |
$250,000 |
$250,000 |
|
Total
Intramural Costs |
$300,000 |
$500,000 |
$400,000 |
|
PROJECT CEILING |
$5,816,000 |
$8,116,400 |
$15,260,000 |